Comparison
Grammarly for English.
WriteX for your region.
If your organization writes only English, Grammarly is a fine tool. The moment Arabic enters the picture, or your data cannot leave the country, the comparison ends quickly.
| WriteX | Grammarly | |
|---|---|---|
| Arabic proofreadingSpelling, grammar, morphology, semantics, style, names | Deep | None |
| Arabic morphology and tashkeelRoot-and-pattern analysis, diacritics on demand | Yes | No |
| English checkingGrammar, style, clarity | Yes | Excellent |
| Spanish checking | Coming soon | Limited |
| Institutional style guidesRules derived from a national standard, assigned per team | National standards | Brand tones |
| Hijri dates and dignitary titlesOfficial correspondence conventions | Yes | No |
| Explains the rule behind each fixThe correction teaches the grammar | Yes | Sometimes |
| On-premises and sovereign deploymentDocuments never leave your network | Yes | No |
| Named-entity verificationPublic figures and organizations against a knowledge base | Yes | No |
| Team and org analyticsLinguistic safety scores, frequent errors, improvement | Yes | Basic |
| Office, browser, and SDK coverage | Yes | Yes |
Compared against the public documentation of both products in July 2026. Check it against your own text before deciding.
The honest version
Different questions, different answers.
Grammarly answers "is my English polished?" and answers it well. WriteX answers "is everything my institution publishes, in Arabic and English alike, correct, on-standard, and provably improving?". If the second question is the one you are being held to, the tools are not interchangeable.
- Grammarly has no Arabic at all, so half your output goes unchecked.
- Brand tones are not a style guide: no titles, no Hijri dates, no institutional dictionary.
- Consumer clouds cannot host a ministry's drafts.
Both tools catch broken English. Only one also proofreads the Arabic version of the same memo.
Choose WriteX if
Your organization writes Arabic, or answers to a standard.
Arabic at full depth, your institution's rules enforced as people type, an audit trail behind every correction, and deployment inside your own perimeter. English is covered to the same bar.
Start writing freeStay with Grammarly if
You write English only, you have no governance or residency requirements, and a consumer subscription per seat is the whole of what you need.
Settle it yourself
Do not take our word for it.
Paste the same paragraph into both tools and count what each one finds. That is the only comparison that matters, and the checker on this site is the real engine.
Frequently asked questions
Can we run WriteX and Grammarly side by side?
Technically yes, but teams consolidate quickly: one engine, one style guide, and one analytics view across both languages beats maintaining two subscriptions.
Is WriteX's English as good as Grammarly's?
For institutional writing, yes: grammar, style, punctuation, named entities, and whole-sentence correction, plus the style-guide and analytics layers Grammarly does not have. Grammarly has more consumer polish features; WriteX has the governance.
We already pay for Grammarly. What changes?
Most institutions keep both for a term, then consolidate once the Arabic gap and the reporting become the deciding factors. We will scope a migration with your admins.
Every word your institution writes, checked.
Official letters to social posts, Arabic and English alike. One assistant that proofreads, enforces your style, and explains every correction, wherever your teams write.
12 error types · Institutional style guides · Works in Office, browsers, and the web editor